Global
Conflicts and the Poor: Where Are We Heading For?
Backdrop: Our generation
is witnessing a Unique Phenomenon amid Expanding Global Conflicts when a Record
number, Sixty Million People are found to be Displaced as Refugees. The phenomenon
of a Global surge in War, Conflict, Persecution, Religious Fundamentalism,
Terrorism, Political Unrest, Border Disputes, Armed Rebellion, Internal
Disturbances and External Aggressions, Sectarian Hostilities etc. on one hand
and Natural Disasters, Forced Displacement due to Developmental Actions etc on
the other, are all responsible for such unprecedented and dramatic shift.
Issues: This
number has almost doubled in the past ten years, while in the past five years at
least 15 conflicts have erupted or reignited. The figures, collected by the UN
agency for its latest Global Trends: World at War, suggest that one in every
122 humans is now either a refugee, internally displaced, or seeking asylum. The
number if notionally considered for the population of a country, it would be
the world’s 24th largest.
Just
to Name a Few
Africa: Côte d'Ivoire, The
Central African Republic, Libya, Mali, South Sudan, Northeastern Nigeria, The
Democratic Republic of the Congo and Burundi.
Middle East: Syria, Iraq and Yemen
Europe: Ukraine
Asia: Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar
and Pakistan
|
More recently, I was in Kigali, Rwanda last month (May 2015)
when just 200 kms south of us, we had the crises precipitated in Burundi. Over
past two months, nearly 100,000 Burundians have fled across the borders,
seeking safety in neighbouring Rwanda, Tanzania and the Democratic Republic of
the Congo.
The plethora of crises and conflicts, observes the UN study,
has also provoked a dangerous and worsening trend in irregular migration as
millions of refugees around the world are pushed into an uncomfortable and
deadly dynamic with human traffickers and smugglers as they seek passage to safety.
Against that backdrop, the alarming figures detailing the global refugee
situation is ultimately compounded by the fact that over half of the world's
total refugees are children.
Alternatives: While
the short term solution may simply lie in a greater humanitarian aid, it would
only act a patch work and seldom provide a permanent solution. Had the permanent solutions or alternatives as
simple, the world would have seen a different Twenty First Century and our generation
would have witnessed much better lives and peace. The recent implementation of
the accord between India and Bangladesh on the Land Border Dispute through an
amicable solution, acceptable to one and all is a typical example of a long
term solution that I witnessed in Dhaka early this month. Can we think of more
such accords globally? Can India and Bangladesh bilaterally teach the World
what the multilateral agencies have not learnt from the past Global experiences?
It would be specious to opine that the prima facie evidence
suggest short term patch work may not work. It certainly will. However, the long
term and permanent solution may require strong political will both, in heart as
well as soul from all stakeholders, building global efforts that are robust and
solid and yet, dynamic. Sustainability efforts targeting livelihoods
opportunity, generating and serving commercial and economic interest would
certainly help. However, bringing this change by means of social protection in
a different milieu altogether would require a paradigm shift in the thinking of
the welfare states and the agencies such as UNHCR and the multilaterals like
the UNDP, World Bank, ADB, DFID etc.
An approach that is the basic of all fundamental tactics and
strategies will have to be adopted by one and all. An approach to provide basic
and fundamental education, linking education with income generating activities
and livelihoods, ability and talent based skill development, providing basic
training on managing money and micro wealth management practices could be just
one part of the sustainable development. As part of the social protection and
providing social safety nets in the interim like employment generation for
building infrastructure, social insurance such as micro insurance including life,
accidental and health insurance to cover the risk of death and co contributory micro
pensions to fight against old age poverty and cover the risk of longevity
should be considered as part of the rehabilitation package itself.
Policy Issue: More
than one fifth of the world’s population lives on less than US$1.25 per day.
Many of these families depend on insecure and fragile livelihoods, including
casual farm and domestic labor. Their income is frequently irregular or
seasonal, putting laborers and their families at risk of hunger.
Self-employment is often the only viable alternative to menial labor for the
ultra-poor, yet many lack the necessary cash or skills to start a business that
could earn more than casual labor.
In the past, many programs that have provided ultra-poor
households with either credit or training to alleviate these constraints have
not been successful at raising household income levels on average. However, in recent years, several international
and local nongovernmental organizations have renewed their support for programs
that foster a transition to more secure livelihoods. Combining complementary
approaches—the transfer of a productive asset, training, consumption support,
and coaching— into one comprehensive program may help spur a sustainable
transition to self-employment.
The Graduation
Approach: This is a basic approach targeted to the ultra poor where an impact
may be visible for an 18-month comprehensive livelihoods program (“the
Graduation approach”). This approach was first developed by Bangladeshi NGO
BRAC in 2002 and has since been replicated in several countries. One of the
recent pilot of the IPA (Innovations for Poverty Action) was tested in Indian
context with Bandhan, an MFI.
The
Graduation Approach Experiment in India
The intervention consisted of six complementary components, each
designed to address specific constraints facing ultra-poor households: 1.
Productive asset transfer: One-time transfer of a productive asset, 2.
Technical skills training on running a business and managing livelihood. 3.
Consumption support: weekly cash transfers for 13 to 40 weeks 4. Savings: Compulsory
Savings for Households 5. Home visits: Weekly home visits by Bandhan staff to
provide accountability, coaching, and encouragement and 6. Health: During
weekly home visits, Bandhan staff discussed health matters.
Impact analysis highlights that long-run benefits outweighed their
up-front costs. Economic impacts: Average
total monthly consumption had an 11 percent increase over households in the
comparison group with more households reporting to having enough food every
day. Ownership of household and productive assets also increased
significantly among Graduation program participants and so was the measures
of financial inclusion. Self-employment:
Households reported spending 25 minutes more per day on productive activities
and experienced a nearly four-fold increase in livestock revenue relative to
comparison group households. Psychosocial
wellbeing: The Graduation program did not affect measures of physical or
mental health. There were no changes in illness, happiness, stress, or
likelihood of feeling anxious or worried in the last year. Political Involvement: One year after
the program ended, 55 percent of treatment group households reported voting
in the last election (compared to 48 percent of the comparison group) and 49
percent reported voicing concerns with their village leaders in the past year
(compared to 44 percent in the comparison group). Cost-benefit analysis: Compared to less comprehensive
interventions, the Graduation program had relatively high up-front costs. While
the total implementation and program costs was US$330 per household (2014 PPP
US$ 1,455) the estimated benefits from consumption and asset growth amount to
2014 PPP US$6,298 per household, representing an overall 433 percent return.
|
The IPA experiment was also piloted in half a dozen more countries
and can be replicated and scaled in such conflict affected areas where a
greater intervention is necessary on humanitarian grounds. Thus while a higher
humanitarian aid in an immediate term could be the demand of the time that
serves the immediate needs, a more semi-permanent need based approach may be
required to provide for social insurance and social safety nets in the medium
term so as to build up a more everlasting and perpetual solution to create sustainable
livelihoods in the longer term.